Holiday Hellth!

Deck the fallsFor many of us the holidays mean family, feasting and fun.  But for our nation’s 18 million health care workers  – 28% of spread the cheerwhom will be working on Thanksgiving, all celebrations will be placed on hold while they help those who are sick or injured.

And, as Christmas approaches, things don’t get any better.  The number of 911 calls and hospital visits spike as the temperatures plummet. For example, around 5,800 people are treated for holiday decorating injuries alone, each year. On top of this, the number one day for cardiac deaths is December 25th with December 26th and January 1st coming in a close second and third.

To raise awareness of the strain put on healthcare workers during the holiday season and some ways they can address it, Carrington College, has released these infographics:Healthcare workers

Whatever you end up doing tomorrow, let’s not forget to say a word of thanks to our healthcare professionals. And if you do end up in their care be thankful they’re there.

Pass the gravy

making spirits brighter

SRxA-logo for web

A Call to End Religious Nutrition

lowcarbQ: “How can you tell if a friend is on a gluten-free diet?”

A: “They’ll tell you.”

Again and again and again… Same joke goes for paleo, low-carbvegan and pretty much any organized dietary strategy that has a defining name and movement behind it.

Along with politics, gun rights, religion and abortion, is one of those areas where people feel comfortable not only sharing their views but do so with incredible conviction, passion and certainty. And yet, nutrition is anything but certain.  Sure, we know there are patterns of eating that help in minimizing the risk of various chronic diseases, but those patterns are far broader and less drilled down than most nutrition gurus and zealots believe.

So, we were very interested in fellow blogger –Yoni Freedhoff’s – recent blog in which he calls for an end of nutrition as religion.  More so, because Yoni is not just another disillusioned dieter. No siree!  He is the Medical Director of the Bariatric Medical Institute and assistant professor of family medicine at the University of Ottawa.  Dr. Freedhoff has also been called Canada’s most outspoken obesity expert and his award winning blog, Weighty Matters, has at times been ranked the world’s top health blog by blog ranking service Technorati.

So what does Dr Freedhoff have to say?

First, he suggests that practitioners of dietary religion risk alienating friends through strict adherence to their religious commandments.  Second, he states that diet adherents tend to use their online platform to frown upon any and all dietary strategies beyond their house of worship. To question their program or guru’s plans is akin to questioning their religious beliefs; and yet, unlike actual religious questioning (which would almost certainly lead to a thoughtful discussion), question dietary dogma online, and you can bet it will lead to a highly heated debate where anger and indignation can easily descend into name calling and personal attacks.

jesus toastAnd even if you religiously avoid all cyber nutrition nuts, you may still be at risk. According to Freedhoff, although you may not have a stranger’s zealous scrutiny to watch out for, you’ve still got yourself. Dietary dogma, almost by definition, dictates blind faith and absolute loyalty, where breaking a dietary commandment is akin to committing a sin. And with sin, comes guilt. And if you feel guilt often enough, you might well decide to abandon your entire healthier-living, guilt-inducing effort.

Nutrition as religion demands perfection, yet perfection is an impossible goal. Remember, food is not simply fuel. Since the dawn of humankind, food has been used for comfort and celebration, and if your newly found dietary religion forbids foods you enjoy, my bet is you’re not long for that diet.

diet tapemeasureSo what’s the solution?  Freedhoff advises : the easiest question to evaluate any dietary plan or religion is simply, “Could I happily live like this for the rest of my life?” where the most important word in that question is “happily.” If the answer’s “No,” you’ve either got to get comfortable with adding in some sinning, or find another way to go.

Add in some sinning in the form of thoughtful, “worth-it,” dietary imperfections, and suddenly new lifestyles may transform from the merely tolerable to the actually enjoyable. Enjoy your lifestyle, albeit imperfectly, and maybe you’ll even stick with it.

Nutrition isn’t religion. Eat the healthiest diet that you can enjoy, because if you’re not enjoying it, it isn’t going to last, and tolerable isn’t good enough.

Go on, sin a little, on us. The good doctor will forgive you enough to forgive yourself.

SRxA-logo for web

Pharma Under Fire for Fair Balance Failings

Unfair balanceUh oh! Seems like the Pharma industry is in trouble again.

Research published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine suggests that family physicians receive “little or no information” about adverse effects associated with medicines in the majority of drug promotions made by sales representatives.

In the study, 255 family doctors from urban practices in the US [Sacrameto], France [Tolouse] and Canada [Montreal and Vancouver] answered questionnaires following visits from sales representatives.  The primary outcome measure was “minimally adequate safety information” (mention of at least one indication, serious adverse event, common adverse event, and contraindication, and no unqualified safety claims or unapproved indications).

The findings showed that sales representatives did not provide any information about common or serious side effects, or identify the patients who should not be using the drug, in 59% of the promotions. In Canada, no potential side effects were mentioned for 66% of promoted products, according to the results.

yes no riskThe researchers also indicated that although 57% of the promoted drugs carried boxed warnings from the FDA or Health Canada, serious adverse events were only discussed in about 6% of the sales pitches.

Félicitations to the French reps who provided information on harm for 61% of the promotions, compared to only 34% in Canada and 39% in the US.

Despite this lack of “fair balance” overall, the doctors considered the quality of the scientific information to be good or excellent for 54% of the promotions and indicated that they would be willing to prescribe the drugs 64% of the time.

Laws in all three countries require sales representatives to provide information on harm as well as benefits,” says lead author Barbara Mintzes, Assistant Professor at the University of British Colombia. “But no one is monitoring these visits and there are next to no sanctions for misleading or inaccurate promotion.”

Despite widespread belief by physicians to the contrary, the information provided by pharmaceutical sales representatives has been shown to influence prescribing. Greater exposure to promotion is associated with higher prescribing volume and costs.  And while regulations in all three countries require sales representatives to provide information on the risks as well as the benefits of their drugs, there are differences.  It’s interesting, to correlate the above results with the fact that that France has the strictest information standards, whereas Canada relies on industry self-regulation.

However, across all three countries, the results of this study would appear to question if current approaches are adequate to protect patient health.

The Pharma Industry should take note.  Time to clean up your act before the Government and Regulatory Authorities do it for you.

SRxA-logo for web

A Ray of Sunshine?

sunshineIt’s already 15 months overdue and it will be another year still before the information is public, but last week  the government  set out  the final rule for the Physician Payment Sunshine Act (Sunshine Act) in a 287 page document!

The Sunshine Act (passed in 2010 as part of the Affordable Care Act) requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologicals, and medical supplies to report all payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals. The rule was supposed to be published in October 2011, but has suffered continuous delays amongst intense lobbying both by groups keen to get the data in the public hands, such as the AARP, and those most affected by it, such as the American Medical Association (AMA).

The final rule announced February 1st, officially puts the Industry on notice. They have until March 2014 to get their payments reporting act together. The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), will then input the data, including payment information from August through December of this year, into a publicly available database which, they say, will be online by September 2014.

doctor_bribes_0318And its not only payments to doctors of medicine that have to be reported. Under the definitions of the Act, “physicians” include doctors of osteopathy, dentists, podiatrists, optometrists and chiropractors.

The rule also requires reporting on both the form and nature of payment or transfer of value made by a manufacturer to a physician.

Forms of payment included under the final rule :

  • Cash or a cash equivalent
  • In-kind items or services
  • Stock, a stock option, or any other ownership interest, dividend, profit or other return on investment
  • Any other form of payment or transfer of value

While, nature of payments include:

  • Consulting fees
  • Compensation for services other than Consulting
  • Honoraria
  • Gifts
  • Entertainment
  • Food
  • Travel
  • Education
  • Research
  • Charitable contributions
  • Royalty or license
  • Current or prospective ownership or investment interest
  • Direct compensation for serving as faculty or as a Speaker for a medical education program
  • Grants
  • Any other payment

doctor + moneyAdvocates of the Sunshine Act have long argued that the public needs to know when doctors are getting paid and by who. “You should know when your doctor has a financial relationship with the companies that manufacture or supply the medicines or medical devices you may need,” said Peter Budetti, M.D. CMS deputy administrator for Program Integrity. “Disclosure of these relationships allows patients to have more informed discussions with their doctors.”

This increased transparency is also intended to help reduce the potential for conflicts of interest that physicians or teaching hospitals could face as a result of their relationships with manufacturers.

Relationships between doctors and drugmakers have been brought up in a number of cases when FDA advisory panels have ruled for or against drugs in which doctors had some interest. For example, last year an advisory panel voted 15-11 to support the approval of Bayer‘s Yaz birth control pills, but allegations later surfaced that four committee members had ties to the manufacturer.

Once the bill is introduced, doctors will get 45 days after information is submitted to vet it for accuracy.

physicians_relationship_with_pharma_companThe American Medical Association (AMA) is not happy.  The doctors’ group wants physicians to have more than 45 days to challenge information in the government’s database and add commentary to explain the payments. It also wants some corporate contributions to physicians excluded from disclosure, including sponsorships for educational activities and “indirect” payments, such as unsolicited contributions a company might make to a nonprofit group affiliated with doctors or to physicians’ employers or practices.

AMA president Jeremy Lazarus wants to ensure “the registries will provide a meaningful and accurate picture of physician-industry interactions. It is critical that the final rule provide physicians with a clear way to correct any inaccurate information and not place any substantial administrative burden on physician practices.”

And the AMA is not alone. Unsurprisingly, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the primary lobbying group for drugmakers, said that while it supports more disclosure, the new regulations should take into account the importance of context in the publication of physician payment information.

Ethical interactions between biopharmaceutical companies and health-care professionals are essential to maintaining patient trust,” said Matthew Bennett, a spokesman for PhRMA. The principle behind the so-called sunshine provision “is complementary to this belief and it has great potential for helping patients understand the ways in which such collaboration benefits their health and medical innovation,”

What’s your take on this new rule? Is the government helping to let the sun shine in or is this a dark, dark day for doctors and pharma?  Let us know your thoughts.

SRxA-logo for web

Geriatric Medicine?

old doctorsPicture this…a distinguished vascular specialist in his 80’s performs surgery, then goes on vacation, forgetting he has patients in the hospital; one subsequently dies because no doctor was overseeing his care.

Or imagine this? An internist who suffered a stroke gets lost going from one exam room to another in his own office.  Crazy? Unbelievable?? Well how about the beloved general surgeon with Alzheimer’s disease who continues to assist in operations because hospital officials don’t have the heart to tell him to retire.

No, these aren’t plots from a new medical drama, they are all real-life examples, exemplifing an emotionally charged issue that is attracting the attention of patient safety experts and hospital administrators.

mƒqƒoƒNƒVƒƒL“‡^’·èn'‚O‚X“~@”픚ŽÒ‚ðfŽ@‚·‚é”ì“c‚³‚ñAbout 42% of the nation’s 1 million physicians are older than 55.  21% are older than 65. And their ranks are expected to increase as many work past the traditional retirement age of 65, for reasons both personal and financial.

Unlike commercial airline pilots, who by law must undergo regular health screenings starting at age 40 and must retire at 65, doctors are subject to no such rules. And while most states require continuing education credits to retain a medical license, “you can sleep through a session, and if you sign your name, you’ll get credit,” observes Ann Weinacker, chief of the medical staff at Stanford Hospital.

The public thinks that physicians’ health and competence is being vigorously monitored and assessed. It isn’t,” said geriatrician William Norcross, 64, founding director of a program at the University of California at San Diego that performs intensive competency evaluations of doctors referred by state medical boards or hospitals. The program, known as PACE, (Physician Assessment and Clinical Education) is one of about 10 around the country.

Norcross, who evaluates 100 to 150 physicians annually, estimates that about 8,000 doctors with full-blown dementia are practicing medicine. And as if that in itself isn’t worrying enough, studies have found, that approximately one-third of doctors don’t even have a personal physician, who might be on the lookout for deteriorating hearing, vision and motor coordination, or the cognitive impairment that precedes dementia.

old-doctor-3Although doctors are not immune to the effects of aging, those with cognitive and neurological problems almost never have insight into their problems many deny that anything is wrong.

While few experts would argue that age alone should control who can continue to practice, some studies suggest that doctors’ skills tend to deteriorate over time. A 2006 report found that patient mortality in complex operations was higher among surgeons older than 60 than among their younger colleagues.

Colleagues have a code of silence,” says New Hampshire health-care consultant Jonathan Burroughs who spent 30 years as an emergency department physician. During his career, Burroughs said he followed several elderly doctors around, quietly correcting their orders to prevent mistakes. According to him, such experiences are nearly universal in medicine. But that kindness can backfire, subjecting patients to potentially disastrous consequences such as serious injury or death, and the faltering physician to a malpractice suit or the loss of a medical license.

Although an older doctor can be a font of wisdom and experience, their skills have not necessarily kept pace; meaning that although they claim they’re practicing state-of-the-art care it’s maybe 20 or 30 years out of date.

Dr-Ephraim-Engleman-100-year-old-doctor-longevityEven so, rheumatologist Ephraim Engleman, who will turn 102 in March, said he plans never to quit. One of the nation’s oldest practicing physicians, Engleman drives from his San Mateo home to the medical campus of the University of California at San Francisco three days a week. There he sees about eight longtime patients per week.  “I’m very much opposed to retirement,” said Engleman, “As long as I’m able intellectually and physically, I’m going to continue.” His only impediment, he said, is severe spinal stenosis, which has left him stooped and dependent on a cane. “I walk like an old man,” he said.

Informed that Stanford, his undergraduate alma mater, has recently begun requiring doctors older than 75 to be tested, he quipped, “I’m glad they don’t do it here.”

So next time you catch yourself thinking cops are looking younger, maybe you should start taking a closer look at your healthcare provider.

SRxA-logo for web

Healthy Trends for Digital Health

health info on ipadDoctors and patients are increasingly tapping, zooming, and clicking in a flurry of connectivity.  According to Fred Pennic author of HIT Consultant’s Mind Blowing HIT Stats and Trends:

  • 85% of US Physicians own or use any smartphone professionally
  • 62% of US physicians own a tablet
  • 81% of physicians own an iPad
  • 50% of tablet owning physicians have used their device at the point of care
  • 39% of US physicians communicate online with patients via email, secure messaging, instant messaging, or online video conferencing
  • Two-thirds of physicians use online video to learn and keep up to date with clinical information
  • 88% of physicians would like patients to be able to track or monitor their health at home

Physicians spend an average of 11 hours online for professional purposes per week. And those with three screens (tablets, smartphones, and desktops/laptops) spend more time online on each device and go online more often during the workday than physicians with one or two screens.

wireless doctorsIn addition to communicating with patients, most doctors say they wish they could wirelessly access electronic medical records, prescribe, monitor both in- and out-patients and track patient referrals.

And it’s not just doctors. Patients and consumers are at it too!  Health related Google searches are up 47% from last year, and:

  • 20% of patients would like to monitor their fitness & wellbeing
  • 18% would like to allow a physician to remotely monitor a condition
  • 80% of Internet users look online for health information
  • 20% search for health related content on mobile devices
  • 23% use social media to follow health experiences of friends

Even more mind-blowing…in 2012 consumers were willing to spend $14 Billion on digital health products. This included $700 Million on mobile health applications, $4 Billion on health related video games and $8.9 Billion on resources rating doctors & hospitals.

No word from Fred on how much of their health information people are getting from blogs such as Word on Health. But with thousands of views each day, and increase in readership of >100% versus 2011, we certainly seem to be part of this upwards digital healthcare trend.

Where do you get your healthcare information? We’d love to hear from you.

SRxA-logo for web

Doctors Deficient in Anaphylaxis Care

Having just returned from the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) annual meeting, we’re spoiled for choice of news. But among all the science there was one stand out shocker.  In a session on Sunday, physicians presented the results of a survey, sponsored by the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA). During this, they revealed that a disturbingly high proportion of primary care and emergency physicians don’t know how to treat anaphylaxis.

Interviews with 318 physicians indicated that:

  • substantial numbers do not always provide epinephrine to patients – even those  they believe are having anaphylactic reactions
  • they often fail to refer anaphylaxis patients for follow-up care
  • they believe incorrectly that some patients should not receive epinephrine auto-injectors

Myron Zitt, MD, says the results reveal “likely deficiencies in physician knowledge,” and corroborate results from earlier chart review studies.

In the telephone-based survey, researchers conducted interviews lasting an average of 19 minutes with approximately 100 emergency room physicians, 100 allergists, 50 adult primary care physicians, and 50 pediatricians.

82% to 99% of respondents in each group said they had treated at least one anaphylaxis case.

Although epinephrine is supposed to be given to all patients having such reactions, about 10% of emergency room physicians and 20% of primary care and pediatric physicians said they had done something else.  These “something else’s” included prescribed another drug, sending the patient to a hospital, or an “other” action.

Prescribing of auto-injectors for patients to take home also was far from universal. Barely 60% of emergency room physicians said they did. In fact, emergency physicians were generally bad at all phases of follow-up care. They rarely referred patients for diagnostic tests, they almost never demonstrated use of an auto-injector, and seldom explained that auto-injectors have an expiration date.

Another disturbing finding from the survey, Zitt said, was that many physicians of all types – even the allergists – mistakenly believed that some patients should never receive epinephrine.

In the same session, Akhil Chouksey, MD, reported that anaphylaxis care in a major teaching hospital usually failed to meet guidelines established by a consortium of allergy societies including the ACAAI.  In a 10-year review of anaphylaxis cases only 15% met the standards of care recommendations i.e. that epinephrine be administered within 30 minutes of triage, that auto-injectors be prescribed at discharge, and that patients be referred to an allergist or immunologist for follow-up investigations and treatment.

The review also found that in 26% of cases in which anaphylaxis was definitively confirmed, the patients never received epinephrine.  Antihistamines, such as benadryl (diphenhydramine), were given in nearly all cases but epinephrine was omitted in one-quarter. In fact, epinephrine was only the third most commonly administered medication, with corticosteroids such as methylprednisolone, taking the second spot after antihistamines.

During the question-and-answer period, an audience member suggested that, when patients present with relatively mild symptoms, the treating physicians may decide that epinephrine isn’t needed at that point.  Zitt countered, that this was a very dangerous approach.

The national guidelines state explicitly that there are no absolute contraindications to epinephrine. Nevertheless, 16% of the pediatric allergists and 32% of the other allergists said there were such contraindications, as did 38% of adult primary care and emergency physicians.

Also common were beliefs that schools, restaurants, and ambulances always stock epinephrine. In fact, Zitt said, there are no general requirements for schools or restaurants to do so, and approximately half of all ambulances do not have epinephrine on hand.

Clearly there is much work still to be done in terms of education.  SRxA’s Word on Health suggests a first step would be to instill a healthy fear of anaphylaxis into doctors and the general public while simultaneously removing the fear of epinephrine.

Or as Dr Zitt says, “Give epinephrine first, ask questions later.”

Nightmare on Allergy Street?

With Halloween rapidly approaching, do you have more than ghosts and ghouls and things that groan in the night to worry about?  If you suffer from seasonal allergies then your answer is almost certainly yes.

Seasonal allergies occur when outdoor allergens such as mold spores, tree, grass and weed pollen are inhaled and cause an allergic reaction.

This year allergy sufferers were subjected to the “perfect storm” of a mild winter, including an unseasonably warm February, and an early spring caused trees to pollinate earlier than normal.

This has been a very strange year for allergies,” says Dr. David Chudwin, an allergist from Crystal Lake, IL. “It’s been the strangest year in the 30 years that I’ve been practicing.”

The early spring was followed by a hot dry summer that kept pollen counts high, day after day.  Then in late summer and early autumn, record-breaking mold counts resulted in county wide air-quality alerts that resulted in even mild allergy sufferers dreading the outdoors.  Although mold is typically associated with dampness, mold spores also are associated with dying vegetation.

Many molds grow on rotting logs and fallen leaves, in compost piles and on grasses and grains. Unlike pollens, molds do not die with the first killing frost. And mold counts can change quickly, depending on the weather. Certain spore types reach peak levels in dry, breezy weather. Some need high humidity, fog or dew to release spores. This group is abundant at night and during rainy periods.

To makes things worse, retreating indoors may not be the answer. For, those bothered by indoor, as well as outdoor, allergens, the season of suffering is just beginning.  As we start to run furnaces and our pets elect to curl up in front of the fire, dust and dander levels start to rise.

According to most of the country’s leading expert on allergies, more Americans than ever are sneezing, sniffling and itching. The Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, estimates 450 million Americans suffer from allergies.

As previously reported by SRxA’s Word on Health, our squeaky clean lifestyle is probably to blame for the rising numbers.  According to the hygiene hypothesis – Children that lead too clean a life are not exposed to enough germs to properly adjust their immune system.

People who are less prone to allergies include children from large families, children who live on farms, children in underdeveloped countries,” Chudwin said.

If you don’t fall into any of these categories, we suggest a trip to your local allergist, who can help prepare you for sneeze-free trick-or-treating and the other joys of fall and winter.

Should new drugs wear a ‘Proceed with Caution’ label?

SRxA’s Word on Health was alarmed to read a new study showing that almost a quarter of prescription drugs approved in Canada over 16 years were later slapped with serious safety warnings or yanked from the market for safety reasons. As Canada’s drug safety agency operates much like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the study may reflect the state of drug safety in the United States as well.

When assessing a new drug, regulators at Health Canada and the FDA are entrusted with making critical and difficult scientific judgments that can affect the health of hundreds of thousands of patients in a matter of months after product launch.

And the cost of error may be high given that the number of people exposed to unsafe drugs may be in the millions.

University of Toronto health policy researcher Dr. Joel Lexchin looked at the 434 drug approvals that moved through Health Canada’s drug-safety arm from the start of 1995 to the end of 2010.

About a quarter of the drugs approved in that period received a fast-track deliberation known as a “priority review” which lasts 180 days instead of the typical 300 days.

Lexchin found that drugs approved this way were 50% more likely to end up with safety warnings, compared with drugs approved according to the customary deliberation period.

And while you might assume that the most-risky drugs would be those those fast-tracked for approval for life-threatening diseases such as cancer and HIV, Lexchin discovered they were no more likely to have safety concerns than drugs fast-tracked for less serious illnesses.

That was a surprise, because regulators could be expected to accept some heightened risks when approving new medications to treat serious illness.

In an accompanying editorial, Thomas J. Moore of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices suggests that new drugs should carry special labeling for their first three years on the market, so that doctors are reminded to prescribe with caution.

Getting faster access to newer, less-thoroughly tested drugs is at best a mixed blessing,” said Moore. “For the first three years after approval, new drugs should carry a special warning akin to the black triangle used in Britain. It should be prominent and mean to every physician, ‘New Drug: Caution Indicated.’

That caution may be worth remembering by both physicians and patients when considering switching to new drugs.

Does Your Doctor ‘Get You’?

Does your doctor understand you? Does he (or she) know what you’re thinking? Does he really feel your pain? In short, does he care?

Seems this is something you should really care about. According to a study just published in Academic Medicine, patients of doctors who are more empathic have better outcomes and fewer complications.

Researchers from Thomas Jefferson University together with a team from Parma, Italy evaluated relationships between physician empathy and clinical outcomes among 20,961 Italian diabetic patients and their 242 physicians.

The study was a follow up to a smaller one undertaken at Thomas Jefferson University that included 891 diabetic patients and 29 physicians, and showed that patients of physicians with high empathy scores had better clinical outcomes than patients of other physicians with lower scores.

This new, large-scale research study has confirmed that empathic physician-patient relationships is an important factor in positive outcomes,” said Mohammadreza Hojat, Ph.D., Research Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior and the Director of Jefferson Longitudinal Study at the Center.  “It takes our hypothesis one step further. Compared to our initial study, it has a much larger number of patients and physicians, a different, tangible clinical outcome, hospital admission for acute metabolic complications, and a cross-cultural feature that will allow for generalization of the findings in different cultures, and different health care systems.”

The Italian researchers used the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) –an instrument used to measure empathy in the context of medical education and patient care. The JSE includes 20 items answered on a seven-point scale (strongly agree = 7, strongly disagree = 1) and measures understanding of patient’s concerns, pain, and suffering, and an intention to help.

The primary outcome measure of the study was acute metabolic complications, including hyperosmolar state, diabetic ketoacidosis, and diabetic coma. These were used because they require hospitalization, can develop quickly, and their prevention is more likely to be influenced by the primary care physicians.

A total of 123 patients were hospitalized because of such complications. Physicians with higher empathy levels had 29 : 7,224 patients admitted to the hospital, whereas physicians with lower levels had 42 : 6,434 patients admitted.

There are many factors that add to the strength of the study. Firstly, because of universal health care coverage in Italy, there is no confounding effect of difference in insurance, lack of insurance or financial barriers to access care.

What’s more, this study was conducted in a health care system in which all residents enroll with a primary care physician resulting in a better defined relationship between the patients and their primary care physicians than what exists in the United States,” said co-author Daniel Z. Louis.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, over 25 million people in the U.S. population have been diagnosed with diabetes, with almost 700,000 hospitalizations per year. There are approximately 2 million new cases per year. Worldwide, the number of total cases jumps to 180 million.

Results of this study confirmed our hypothesis that a validated measure of physician empathy is significantly associated with the incidence of acute metabolic complications in diabetic patients, and provide the much-needed, additional empirical support for the beneficial effects of empathy in patient care” said Dr. Hojat. “These findings also support the recommendations of such professional organizations as the Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Board of Internal Medicine of the importance of assessing and enhancing empathic skills in undergraduate and graduate medical education.”

Does your doctor get you? Let us know.